As we continue our deep dive into the harvesting and post-harvest processes, one of the most debated topics among cannabis growers is flushing. Some cultivators consider it an essential step for producing smooth, flavorful cannabis, while others argue that it has little to no impact on final quality.
Flushing refers to stopping the use of nutrients and feeding plants only water in the last days or weeks before harvest. The idea is to force the plant to use up its stored nutrients, resulting in a cleaner-burning product with better taste and reduced harshness. However, recent scientific studies have called this practice into question, finding little measurable difference in THC content, terpenes, or taste between flushed and unflushed cannabis.
In this blog, we’ll explore what flushing does, its potential benefits, the scientific findings on its effectiveness, and best practices for growers. By the end, you’ll have the knowledge to determine whether flushing is the right choice for your cultivation setup.
What Is Flushing, and How Does It Work?
Flushing is a pre-harvest technique where growers stop feeding plants nutrients and instead provide only pH-balanced water for a set period before harvesting. The goal is to flush out excess nutrients and mineral salts from the plant’s system, ensuring that the final product burns smoothly and has no harsh chemical aftertaste.
The process typically lasts 7 to 14 days, depending on the growing medium:
- Soil-based grows: 10–14 days before harvest
- Coco coir grows: 7–10 days before harvest
- Hydroponic systems: 3–7 days before harvest
The fundamental idea behind flushing is that excess nutrients, particularly nitrogen and salts, can remain in plant tissues if not adequately flushed out before harvest. These residues are believed to contribute to harsh smoke, chemical aftertastes, and poor combustion quality, leading to an unpleasant consumer experience. Traditional growers argue that flushing forces the plant to consume its internal nutrient reserves, which allegedly improves the smoothness and purity of the final product. Additionally, anecdotal evidence suggests that unflushed cannabis can result in black ash and a harsher throat feel, whereas properly flushed cannabis burns to clean, white ash. This belief has led to flushing becoming a widespread practice among cultivators, particularly those using synthetic nutrients in hydroponic and coco-based systems.
However, recent research challenges the assumption that flushing significantly alters nutrient content in harvested buds. Scientific studies analysing cannabis plants subjected to different flushing periods have found no measurable differences in nutrient concentrations, THC levels, terpene profiles, or consumer preference. This suggests that flushing may not effectively remove stored nutrients as previously thought but rather forces the plant into a state of starvation during a crucial stage of resin production. Instead of improving the quality of the final product, extended flushing may actually hinder cannabinoid and terpene development, leading to potential losses in potency and aroma. These findings indicate that a well-balanced nutrient regimen throughout the plant’s lifecycle, combined with proper drying and curing, may have a far greater impact on overall quality than pre-harvest flushing alone.
The Debate: Does Flushing Actually Improve Cannabis Quality?
For years, many growers have claimed that flushing is necessary for removing unwanted chemical residues, improving flavour, and ensuring smoother smoke. However, scientific research has yet to provide strong evidence supporting these claims.
A study conducted by Rx Green Technologies tested cannabis plants subjected to different flushing periods (14, 10, 7, and 0 days) and measured:
- THC and terpene content
- Taste and smoothness of smoke
- Ash colour after combustion
- Overall consumer preference
Surprisingly, the study found no significant differences between flushed and unflushed cannabis in terms of THC, terpenes, or yield. In fact, a blind taste test showed that panellists preferred the taste and smoothness of the cannabis that was NOT flushed.
One of the key takeaways from this study is that flushing does not significantly impact the removal of stored nutrients from cannabis flowers. The plant naturally metabolises nutrients as it matures, and excessive flushing may actually stress the plant and reduce final quality.
How Flushing Affects Taste, Smoke, and Burn Quality
Flushing is often associated with producing cannabis that burns cleaner and tastes better. The rationale is that plants with high residual nutrient content produce black ash and harsh smoke, while flushed plants burn to white ash and have a smoother taste.
However, the Rx Green Technologies study found that the duration of flushing had no effect on the colour of the ash or the perceived smoothness of the smoke. While some growers still swear by the practice, others suggest that proper curing and drying techniques play a much bigger role in determining the final taste and burn quality of cannabis.
Instead of relying solely on flushing, growers should focus on maintaining a balanced nutrient schedule throughout the plant’s life cycle and implementing proper drying and curing to ensure a smooth, flavorful product.
Best Practices for Flushing Cannabis
If you still prefer to flush your plants before harvest, following these best practices will ensure that you do so effectively without compromising quality:
- Use pH-Balanced Water: Ensure the water used for flushing is in the optimal pH range (5.8–6.2 for hydroponics, 6.2–6.8 for soil) to prevent nutrient lockout.
- Gradual Nutrient Reduction: Instead of abruptly stopping nutrients, slowly decrease feeding in the final weeks of flowering.
- Monitor Leaf and Bud Condition: Yellowing leaves may indicate that the plant is using stored nutrients, but excessive flushing can cause stress and reduce overall vigor.
- Consider Growing Medium Differences: Soilless and hydroponic growers require shorter flushing periods compared to traditional soil growers.
- Combine Flushing with Proper Curing: Many of the benefits attributed to flushing (smoother smoke, better taste) are actually the result of a well-executed curing process rather than nutrient depletion.
Is Flushing Necessary?
The debate over flushing remains one of the most controversial topics in cannabis cultivation. While many traditional growers believe that removing nutrients before harvest leads to a cleaner, smoother product, scientific studies suggest otherwise. The research conducted on different flushing periods found no measurable differences in potency, flavour, or smoke quality, and in some cases, non-flushed cannabis was preferred in blind taste tests.
Instead of relying on flushing, growers should focus on optimising nutrient uptake throughout the plant’s life cycle, ensuring proper drying and curing techniques, and maintaining overall plant health. Healthy plants produce high-quality cannabis, regardless of whether they are flushed or not.
Would you still choose to flush your cannabis before harvest? Let us know your thoughts and experiences.
Reach us on WhatsApp