The Global Cannabis March
is an annual event that brings together individuals from diverse backgrounds to advocate for cannabis legalisation and reform. It’s an annual rally held at different locations around the world on the first Saturday in May—a notable event in cannabis culture. The first Global Cannabis March was held in 1999. Since then, hundreds of thousands of people have participated in over 1034 various cities in 85 nations and subnational areas.
The march serves as a platform to voice opposition to proposed cannabis legislation and to demand amendments that better reflect the needs and rights of cannabis users. Despite shared goals, the community displays ideological diversity, with some advocating for immediate bill signing, believing subsequent amendments will rectify imperfections, while others reject the bill outright.
Origins and Evolution
In South Africa. Our First Global Cannabis March was held in Cape Town, to emphasize the significance of cannabis activism. Over time, it has grown into a national movement, highlighting the widespread support for cannabis reform and legalisation across various provinces. This year we had more than 4 different provinces join in on the march and activism. May the 4th has become a staple day for cannabis users in South Africa. More are willing to stand up for their belief in cannabis and what positives it has on their lives. More are waking up to the fact that cannabis is a healing plant. This alone has driven this day to be such a success and why it is rapidly growing into a bigger and bigger rally every year.
Participants and Diversity
The march attracts participants from all walks of life, uniting individuals from different provinces and nations. This diversity underscores the widespread and varied support for cannabis advocacy globally. People were out with their “free the weed” signs. Shouting and marching proudly for their medicine. Banners that read “We are not Criminals” could be seen in the crowd too.
The participation in this event proves that cannabis unites us all. From the Rastafari to skater-boy, we all recognise the threats that this bill has to our use of cannabis. One thing I would like to encourage us is to remember that with or without legislation we the people that use cannabis will not stop because of some laws being passed. Yes, we want to be seen as equals and use our medicine as we need. But legislation has and never will stop us. If it stops you… reevaluate where you stand in this industry.
Key Advocacy Issues
One of the primary objectives of the Global Cannabis March is to oppose proposed legislation that does not adequately address the concerns of cannabis advocates. Participants aim to highlight key issues and push for legislative changes that align with community needs. Restrictions on the plant’s growth and how many plants a user may have are all things that will restrict healing. No one person’s cannabis needs are the same. To produce different forms of medication with the plant. Various quantities and qualities are required.
The bill does not allow for the commercialisation of cannabis, something that most want to see. The criminal offences and possible charges can still be seen as extremely harsh. It has serious jail time still being hung over our heads.
Ideological Diversity
Despite shared objectives, participants often hold differing views on the best approach to legislative change. Some advocate for signing the bill with hopes of amending it later, while others argue for more comprehensive reform from the outset. Those who showed up asking to sign the bill have their own reasons why. Most believe that after the bill is signed we will have the power to amend the bill and have to amend it to suit us the users best. However, this can be seen as a futile endeavour as one can simply look into the past and see how activists and lawmakers have worked together. Once in place, an amendment to the bill could be so far-fetched that we will be stuck with what has been signed.
Consider the fact that this piece of paper was supposed to be signed in 2020 already. Now 4 years later some still feel like they have a say over the sections and parts of the bill.
Cannabis as a Religious Sacrament
For communities like the Rastafari, cannabis holds religious significance, used as a holy sacrament in spiritual practices. Legislative restrictions on cannabis use infringe upon religious freedoms and cultural practices. Making it ‘illegal’ for these people to continue with their rights. Isolating them from the children while using cannabis as a holy sacrament. Adults are allowed to drink alcohol at home in front of their kids. Some smoke cigarettes and this is no issue to them. We need to eliminate these hypocrisies.
Legislative Challenges and Aspirations
Navigating bureaucratic systems presents challenges in achieving meaningful policy changes. Participants hope for inclusive and fair policymaking that recognises the diverse needs and practices associated with cannabis use. We don’t want a one-glove solution as this will not work. Realising that cannabis is versatile and has many many applications it would be wiser for lawmakers to provide more freedom than restrictions around the cannabis plant. In turn, it will not stifle innovation in the industry as it has till this point.
The grey area doesn’t help. It provides more confusion to most. But even so. I would take confusion over an unfair bill.
Future Goals and Community Engagement
The Global Cannabis March aims to raise public awareness and foster community engagement in advocating for cannabis rights. Participants seek to drive positive change within the cannabis industry through collective action and solidarity. The Global Cannabis March is a vital platform for advocating cannabis reform and legalisation globally. Despite ideological differences, participants unite in their commitment to advancing the cannabis industry in a manner that respects rights, promotes inclusivity, and drives positive societal change.
On what side of the coin are you? Do you think signing the bill now to make amendments later makes sense? Or do you feel like it should just be rejected and a new bill written?
Write to us in the comments below.
